[Logo] Jaikoz and SongKong Forums
  [Search] Search   [Recent Topics] Recent Topics   [Members]  Member Listing   [Groups] Back to home page 
[Register] Register / 
[Login] Login 
Messages posted by: kontrozi  XML
Profile for kontrozi -> Messages posted by kontrozi [10]
Author Message
Hi, I think I am still facing an issue with the match full album feature.
To my understanding files are only matched and copied if all songs of an album are available. Optionally this can be limited to one folder.

However when running song kong over my collection I often receive incomplete directories...
This is also reflected in the Report:
My options:
Grouping:Replace if empty From Discogs Style, Max no of Genres 1
Only allow match if all songs in grouping match to one album
Only allow match if all tracks in album were matched

Enjoy Yourself - dd240c67-a57a-41bd-97b4-3d2d15b7095d, 4 songs of 2 (due to duplicates)
Universal Records, Cat No:UND 56232, CD

But the files are:
Rewind - 810cbecf-fc91-48ad-8613-e55838036cf1, 1 songs of 2 Public Demand, Cat NoPDT 39, 12" Vinyl

and other...
It seems in some cases the match is done due to duplicates. So only the overall number of songs is considered instead of each acousticID, right?
Would it be possible to control the kind of album SongKong prefers?
I have a large collection, but most of the songs are duplicates. I would like to prefer complete albums (number of songs > 5) instead of single compilations...Esp. for Various Artist Collections...
I am using SK 3.12. but also bought Jaikoz

I tried several times to delete duplicates in a folder.
Duplicates are present. But SongKong always stops with the error:

Problem with delete duplicates: fromIndex(0) > toIndex(-1)

In the end no duplicates are moved/ deleted.
Any advancements for this issue?
I am facing the same "unexpected" results.
I am using MacOS current version.
I reinstalled the software multiple times. No change.
I reinstalled also an older versions with no change, So there may be some configurations which are not deleted when uninstalling the software.
Where I may find those?

during my first tests, there were a lot of templates available for File name masking. Currently no templates are available as well as the possibility to select JScript Functions is no longer available.

I am not 100 % sure but It seems to me that this changed with the update to 3.6.

Any idea ?

The downside is that currently it is not possible to start an analysis of the songs. At least I think that is the reason, because there is no error message.
When pressing the start button there is no reaction of the system.
Hi, yes the issue can be closed..
The acousticID was part of the mass, but it was not shown in the report.
when cleaning up my library SongKong appends the acoustic id to the name : e.g.
001 - 001 - CeliceAQADtFLChOmDY3syMNaCD5PxsESPJ8eR00KyPApq9DxcR0cv9Ifz4C-KT0OCeNKNS8eP40pw8ngmNA_64Lzw9DlCPSO0_EL05ELzJWAo41F0fAlROTumCEfSI2eOa8fUigL14xKxJ3CVOThNoTleXMizC8n0o6nI4VRkodGqo4-O9j7OH051nC46HckRTzmefbhPHKUURviOzcfaHf3xUDhDGyeD_whznIdYXZjIH.mp3?
Instead of the just the title..
I think the file pattern is ok and does not contain the A-ID.

I am facing the same issue. Additionally it seems the find duplicate (60k) songs based on Acustic ID only seems to take ages respectively not work. After a day the progress bar still seems to be near zero.

Another issue: how to increase the memory the described procedure does not work, as there is no line in the parameters? What are the default values if no memory parameters are given?
Profile for kontrozi -> Messages posted by kontrozi [10]
Go to:   
Powered by JForum 2.1.6 © JForum Team